Sort Array Of Objects By Value Using Underscore.js
Solution 1:
The issue here is that you wanted the array to be sorted in descending order by average
, instead of the default ascending order.
You could do this by providing a custom iteratee
to the _.sortBy()
function:
_.sortBy( jsonData, function( item ) { return -item.average; } )
But I don't recommend that. It would be much better to simply use the native JavaScript [].sort()
method and provide it a comparison function:
jsonData.sort( function( a, b ) { return b.average - a.average; } )
If you were sorting a very large array, this would also be faster than using _.sortBy()
. Look at the source code for _.sortBy()
to see why:
_.sortBy = function(obj, iteratee, context) {
iteratee = cb(iteratee, context);
return _.pluck(_.map(obj, function(value, index, list) {
return {
value: value,
index: index,
criteria: iteratee(value, index, list)
};
}).sort(function(left, right) {
var a = left.criteria;
var b = right.criteria;
if (a !== b) {
if (a > b || a === void0) return1;
if (a < b || b === void0) return -1;
}
return left.index - right.index;
}), 'value');
};
It's doing quite a bit of work in addition to the .sort()
call - and this code is just the tip of the iceberg, the helper functions it calls like cb()
do a lot of work too.
Why do all that when it's just as easy to call .sort()
directly yourself?
Also, it takes a close reading of that lengthy .sortBy()
source to be sure that it does a numeric sort instead of a lexicographic sort - and the documentation doesn't say!
A lexicographic sort (aka alphabetic sort) is where the values are sorted as strings, not as numbers. So for example it would use this order:
[ 1424, 2367, 241, ... ]
When you call the native array .sort()
yourself, you can easily verify that it uses a numeric sort: the value b.average - a.average
is always a number.
Post a Comment for "Sort Array Of Objects By Value Using Underscore.js"